Fogwing Smart Manufacturing Platform

Learning Center
Asset Management

Corrective Maintenance vs Preventive Maintenance

The relentless hum of machinery is the lifeblood of a manufacturing facility. But even the most robust equipment encounters hiccups along the way. Ensuring smooth operation requires a strategic approach to maintenance. 

Here, we delve into the two main philosophies: corrective maintenance (CM) and preventive maintenance (PM). Understanding their strengths and weaknesses will empower you to craft the optimal maintenance strategy for your manufacturing needs.

Corrective Maintenance: A Reactive Response

Imagine a critical piece of equipment stops functioning mid-production. Panic sets in, deadlines loom, and the pressure to get things back online intensifies. Corrective maintenance steps in during these reactive situations, focusing on:

  • Addressing Equipment Failures After They Occur: CM reacts to breakdowns, aiming to diagnose the problem and implement repairs to restore functionality as quickly as possible. This minimizes downtime and production losses, getting your operations back on track.

  • The Repair Process: Technicians become detectives, analyzing error codes, abnormal noises, or visual signs of damage to pinpoint the culprit. Repairs might involve replacing parts, making adjustments, or even seeking assistance from the equipment manufacturer. The emphasis is on getting things back online quickly, sometimes with temporary fixes until a more permanent solution can be implemented during a planned downtime window.

Preventive Maintenance: Proactive Defense

Preventive maintenance takes a proactive stance, preventing problems before they snowball into full-blown breakdowns. Here’s how it works:

  • Stopping Problems Before They Start: PM focuses on identifying and addressing potential equipment issues before they escalate into failures. This proactive approach extends equipment lifespan, minimizes downtime, and optimizes performance, ultimately translating to smoother operations and reduced costs.

  • Scheduled Maintenance Activities: Regular inspections and maintenance tasks are performed based on factors like manufacturer recommendations, equipment usage patterns, or criticality. These tasks might include lubrication, cleaning, filter replacements, minor adjustments, or even calibrations. The goal is to catch and address minor issues before they morph into major problems.

CM vs. PM: A Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureCorrective Maintenance
Preventive Maintenance
ApproachReactiveProactive
Cost (Upfront)Lower
Higher (due to scheduled tasks)
Cost (Long-Term)Potentially higher (emergency repairs, equipment damage)
Lower (fewer breakdowns, extended equipment life)
DowntimeUnpredictable and potentially longer due to emergency nature
Minimized due to planned maintenance activities
SafetyIncreased risk of accidents due to unexpected breakdowns
Lower risk due to catching potential issues before they become safety hazards
PlanningMinimal planning required
Requires planning and scheduling of maintenance tasks
Share Article

Get our newsletters delivered directly to your inbox.

By submitting ,you agree to Fogwing Terms of Service. Your personal data will be processed in accordance with Fogwing Privacy Policy.

Read more articles...

Scroll to Top